Overall, I agree with the view that laws and rules set
down by the government are necessary for the well-being society. Society would
be in complete chaos without due restrictions.
There are two reasons for this. Firstly, as the earth’s
resources are limited and there are not enough to satisfy everyone, laws
provide the necessary criteria to help people to address conflicts of interest.
For example, property law helps citizens to identify property ownership, and
help them to avoid fights over a piece of land or personal property as was
common in early history. Secondly, laws and rules force people to live up to
their obligations. Without the deterrent effect of heavy fines, drivers would be
more likely to exceed the speech limit, despite the possibility of hitting
other cars or pedestrians. Similarly, without environment laws and regulations,
more factories may discharge toxic sewage direct into rivers and lakes, resulting
in serious ecological consequences.
On the other hand, although laws and rules are the cornerstone
of an orderly society, regulation should be a means rather than an end. It is
possible that some laws and rules are so harsh that most citizens feel their
rights are violated. When this happens, the government should respect the will
of the majority and change laws and rules.
In conclusion, I believe that the rule of law is
essential for any properly-functioning society because it makes society more
stable, efficient and fair. Nevertheless, laws and rules should be changed if
most citizens believe that they are too strict, so that laws and rules should
be enforced without denying citizens the freedom that they deserve.
没有评论:
发表评论